Improving Education through Collecting and Analyzing Information
Red Lake Nation College engages in ongoing assessment of teaching and learning.
Our ongoing analysis of teaching and learning is a continued promise to maintain high standards of education at our college. We are dedicated to ensuring our education is culturally rich and diverse and that standards are met. We follow a Program Outcome document that details the standards we work with and the levels of progress we expect to achieve, as well as a Program Review document to show the relationships between the steps and the courses. We also keep yearly reports, which include data analysis of student performance, academic reviews, and review and collaboration by committees.
Institutional Outcomes
-Students will learn inherent knowledge of the Red Lake Ojibwe language, culture, and history.
-Students will demonstrate leadership through effective verbal and written communication.
-Students will examine the world through critical inquiry and analysis.
-Students will learn values and principles of an Ojibwe worldview and exercise civic responsibility.
– Students will gain fundamental knowledge in math, science, and technology

President King and Students at the Capitol in Washington DC.
Institutional Outcome Rubrics
Rigor Rubric
Thoughtful Work | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Student Learning | Students demonstrate their learning by completing recall and retell tasks. Most tasks draw on memorization and focus on answering recall-type questions. | Students demonstrate their learning by completing tasks that require comprehension. | Students demonstrate their learning by completing tasks that validate their ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or evaluate new instructional content. | Students develop their own learning tasks that stretch their creativity, originality, design, or adaptation. |
Instructional Design | Learning tasks include one assigned way for students to demonstrate their thinking. | Learning tasks include one or more assigned ways for students to demonstrate their thinking. | Learning tasks allow students to self-select options to best represent their thinking. | Learning tasks extend students’ learning, inspiring them to pursue self-discovery. |
High-Level Questioning | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
Student Learning | Students respond to questions that mainly focus on basic recall and retell. | Students respond to questions that demonstrate a comprehension of content. | Students fully explain and justify their thinking when responding to questions that demonstrate different levels of thinking, including questions that require analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of information. | Students actively engage in developing rigorous questions to challenge the thinking of their peers. |
Instructional Design | Lesson mainly includes questions at the recall and retell level, and/or not all students are required to respond to each question. | Lesson includes questions at a range of levels, but not all students are required to respond to each question. | Lesson uses questioning to carefully support students in moving to higher levels of thinking, ensuring that all students have an opportunity to respond. | Lesson is designed to inspire all students to engage in high-level questioning around the learning task with their instructors and peers. |
Academic Discussion | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
Student Learning | Student discussion is driven by the instructor and mainly remains at the retell level, mostly using everyday language, with little to no evidence of academic or domain specific vocabulary. Student discussion focuses on a variety of topics with each student offering his/her own thinking without using ideas from peers. | Student discussion, structured by prompts from the instructor, includes a combination of retelling, analysis, and/or stating a claim and defending it with evidence. Students provide explanations or evidence of their thinking and respond to their peers’ comments. | Students engage with peers in instructor guided academic discussions focused on analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of content driven topics, using academic language to express their thinking regarding the major concepts studied. Students support their ideas with concrete explanations and evidence paraphrasing as appropriate, and build on or challenge the ideas of others. | Students primarily drive the discussion, consistently adding value to the dialogue with their peers and instructor, and respecting the opinion and thoughts of both. Students are able to stay focused on the activities of inquiry and engage in dialogue, using content-rich vocabulary with their peers. |
Instructional Design | Lesson mostly structures discussion as instructor-led, with the majority of interactions instructor to student. | Lesson structures discussion as a mix of instructor-led and peer-to-peer with the instructor facilitating the majority of discussions. | Lesson mostly structures discussion as independent peer-to-peer. The instructor facilitates and redirects the discussion as needed, while evaluating the quality. | Lesson is designed to inspire students to independently engage in dialogue and add valuable academic content around the learning tasks. |
Programming | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
Opportunity and Initiation | The institution provides few educational and co-curricular opportunities that are academically, intellectually, and personally challenging in the areas of Ojibwe language, culture, history, communication, critical inquiry, civic responsibility, and math, science and technology | The institution provides some educational and co-curricular opportunities that are academically, intellectually, and personally challenging in the areas of Ojibwe language, culture, history, communication, critical inquiry, civic responsibility, and math, science and technology. | The institution provides numerous educational and co-curricular opportunities that are academically, intellectually, and personally challenging in the areas of Ojibwe language, culture, history, communication, critical inquiry, civic responsibility, and math, science and technology. | Students initiate participation in educational and co-curricular opportunities that are academically, intellectually, and personally challenging in the areas of Ojibwe language, culture, history, communication, critical inquiry, civic responsibility, and math, science and technology. |
Relevance Rubric
Meaningful Work | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Student Learning | Student work is procedural and structured, reflecting a basic understanding of information learning during the lesson. Student work focuses on class-specific content, with an emphasis on building skills, developing comprehension, or other foundation skills. | Students think critically about content and apply information learned to address a specific task. Student work demonstrates originality. Student work requires application of knowledge learned during the lesson. | Students think critically about content and apply information learned to address a range of cross- disciplinary tasks. Student work demonstrates creativity and originality. Student work requires real-world, predictable and/or unpredictable application that has a direct connection to a career in the related field of study. | Students think and act critically to curate content and apply information learned to address a range of cross-disciplinary tasks which are both creative and original. Student work requires the ability to select, organize, and present content through relevant products with multiple solutions. |
Instructional Design | Lesson provides students an opportunity to demonstrate foundational understanding of content. | Lesson provides students an opportunity to complete a specific task that requires application of knowledge. | Lesson provides students an opportunity to select from a range of real-world, relevant tasks, using critical thinking about new learning to complete the task. | Lesson inspires students with an opportunity to think critically about new learning to create their own real-world, relevant tasks. |
Authentic Resources | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
Student Learning | Students mainly engage with one source of information for the lesson. Students use one source to complete tasks focused on making simple connections to content. | Students engage with one primary source of information for the lesson, and use secondary sources to support it. Students use one or more sources to complete real-world tasks focused on making simple connections to content. | Students engage with multiple sources of information, both primary and secondary, during a lesson. Students use multiple sources of information to complete real-world tasks involving comparisons, analysis, argument, and research. | Students engage with multiple sources of information, both primary and secondary, during a lesson, including multi-format resources. Students select and use a variety of resources to solve predictable or unpredictable real-world scenarios. |
Instructional Design | Lesson relies on one source of information. The lesson is organized around the structure of the content-specific text. | Lesson is structured around an essential understanding/question, uses primary and secondary sources, and includes opportunities for students to connect content to a content-specific text and an additional source. | Lesson is structured around an essential understanding/question and relies on multiple authentic texts and resources to conduct comparisons, analysis, arguments, research, and other relevant, real-world tasks. | Lesson is structured around an essential understanding/question and relies on students to select multiple authentic texts and resources to engage in real-world problem solving. |
Learning Connections | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
Student Learning | Students seldom have the opportunity to engage in content that has explicit connection to real-world application. | Students occasionally engage in content that explicit connection to real-world application. | Students engage in content that has explicit connections to real-world applications. | Students discover opportunities to apply content to their lives as well as real-world applications. |
Instructional Design | Lesson provides appropriate content, but without explicit connections to real-world applications. | Lesson provides some opportunities to connect content learned to real world application. | Lesson provides multiple explicit opportunities for students to connect content learned to real-world applications. | Lesson inspires students to create their own opportunities to connect content learned to their lives, as well as real-world applications. |
Programming | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
The institution provides few learning experiences that are directly applicable to the personal aspirations, interests, or cultural experiences of students as well as their connection to real-world issues, problems, and contexts. | The institution provides some learning experiences that are directly applicable to the personal aspirations, interests, or cultural experiences of students as well as their connection to real-world issues, problems, and contexts. | The institution provides numerous learning experiences that are directly applicable to the personal aspirations, interests, or cultural experiences of students as well as their connection to real-world issues, problems, and contexts. | Students are directly involved in developing and providing numerous learning experiences that are directly applicable to the personal aspirations, interests, or cultural experiences of students as well as their connection to real world issues, problems, and contexts. |
Cultural Responsivity Rubric
Meaningful Connections | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Student Learning | Students do not have the opportunity to make meaningful connections between home and school by incorporating their cultural identity and life experiences into their coursework. | Students have minimal opportunity to make meaningful connections between home and school by incorporating their cultural identity and life experiences into their coursework. | Students have several opportunities to make meaningful connections between home and school by incorporating their cultural identity and life experiences into their coursework. | Students have multiple opportunities to make meaningful connections between home and school by incorporating their cultural identity and life experiences into their coursework. |
Instructional Design | Lesson solely prescribes mainstream ways of knowing and making meaning. | Lesson primarily relies on mainstream ways of knowing and making meaning. | Lesson provides several perspectives on situations or ideas and supports student understanding of all of them. | Lesson provides multiple perspectives on situations or ideas and supports student understanding of all of them. |
Diversity | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
Student Learning | Students do not have the opportunity to approach lesson from a variety of cultural, racial, ethnic, or linguistic backgrounds. | Students have minimal opportunity to approach lesson from a variety of cultural, racial, ethnic, or linguistic backgrounds. | Students have several opportunities to approach lesson from a variety of cultural, racial, ethnic, or linguistic backgrounds. | Students have multiple opportunities to approach lesson from a variety of cultural, racial, ethnic, or linguistic backgrounds. |
Instructional Design | Lesson does not impart a multicultural perspective. | Lesson incorporates minimal diversity in cultural perspectives. | Lesson includes several references from varying cultural perspectives. | Lesson includes multiple references from varying cultural perspectives. |
Social Action | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
Student Learning | Students have no opportunities to connect learning to social, political, or environmental concerns that are relevant to them. | Students have minimal predetermined opportunities to connect learning to social, political, or environmental concerns that are relevant to them. | Students have several predetermined opportunities to connect learning to social, political, or environmental concerns that are relevant to them. | Students are given the opportunity to explore many avenues of their choosing that connect learning to social, political, or environmental concerns that are relevant to them. |
Instructional Design | Lesson does not incorporate cultural references to impart knowledge, skills, and attitudes. | Lesson incorporates minimal cultural references to impart knowledge, skills, and attitudes. | Lesson incorporates several cultural references to impart knowledge, skills, and attitudes. | Lesson incorporates multiple cultural references to impart knowledge, skills, and attitudes. |
Programming | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
The pedagogy of culturally responsive teaching drives the creation of few academic and operational functions of the institution. | The pedagogy of culturally responsive teaching drives the creation of some academic and operational functions of the institution. | The pedagogy of culturally responsive teaching drives the creation of most academic and operational functions of the institution. | The pedagogy of culturally responsive teaching drives the creation of all academic and operational functions of the institution |
Institutional Priority
Meaningful Connections | 1 – Beginning | 2 – Emerging | 3 – Developed | 4 – Well-Developed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Communicate using various technology mediums (email, student learning software, computer applications. | Students have little understanding of using and /or understanding most available technology mediums at RLNC. | Students have a fair understanding of using most available technology mediums at RLNC. | Students have a good understanding of using all available technology mediums at RLNC. | Students have a well- developed skill set and understanding using all available technology mediums at RLNC. |
Use of available technology in order to find, evaluate, and apply appropriate sources. | Students have little understanding of how to use available technology to find, evaluate, and use sources for assignments given. | Students have a fair understanding of how to use available technology to find, evaluate, and use sources for most assignments given. | Students have a good understanding of how to use available technology to find, evaluate, and use sources for any assignment given. | Students have a well-developed understanding of how to use available technology to find, critically evaluate, and use sources in an integrated manner for any assignment given. |
See What We’ve Been Up To
CONNECT WITH US ON SOCIAL MEDIA